Files
deerflow-factory/deer-flow/skills/public/github-deep-research/assets/report_template.md
DATA 6de0bf9f5b Initial commit: hardened DeerFlow factory
Vendored deer-flow upstream (bytedance/deer-flow) plus prompt-injection
hardening:

- New deerflow.security package: content_delimiter, html_cleaner,
  sanitizer (8 layers — invisible chars, control chars, symbols, NFC,
  PUA, tag chars, horizontal whitespace collapse with newline/tab
  preservation, length cap)
- New deerflow.community.searx package: web_search, web_fetch,
  image_search backed by a private SearX instance, every external
  string sanitized and wrapped in <<<EXTERNAL_UNTRUSTED_CONTENT>>>
  delimiters
- All native community web providers (ddg_search, tavily, exa,
  firecrawl, jina_ai, infoquest, image_search) replaced with hard-fail
  stubs that raise NativeWebToolDisabledError at import time, so a
  misconfigured tool.use path fails loud rather than silently falling
  back to unsanitized output
- Native client back-doors (jina_client.py, infoquest_client.py)
  stubbed too
- Native-tool tests quarantined under tests/_disabled_native/
  (collect_ignore_glob via local conftest.py)
- Sanitizer Layer 7 fix: only collapse horizontal whitespace, preserve
  newlines and tabs so list/table structure survives
- Hardened runtime config.yaml references only the searx-backed tools
- Factory overlay (backend/) kept in sync with deer-flow tree as a
  reference / source

See HARDENING.md for the full audit trail and verification steps.
2026-04-12 14:23:57 +02:00

3.5 KiB

[!NOTE] Generate this report in user's own language.

{TITLE}

  • Research Date: {DATE}
  • Timestamp: {TIMESTAMP}
  • Confidence Level: {CONFIDENCE_LEVEL}
  • Subject: {SUBJECT_DESCRIPTION}

Repository Information

  • Name: {REPOSITORY_NAME}
  • Description: {REPOSITORY_DESCRIPTION}
  • URL: {REPOSITORY_URL}
  • Stars: {REPOSITORY_STARS}
  • Forks: {REPOSITORY_FORKS}
  • Open Issues: {REPOSITORY_OPEN_ISSUES}
  • Language(s): {REPOSITORY_LANGUAGES}
  • License: {REPOSITORY_LICENSE}
  • Created At: {REPOSITORY_CREATED_AT}
  • Updated At: {REPOSITORY_UPDATED_AT}
  • Pushed At: {REPOSITORY_PUSHED_AT}
  • Topics: {REPOSITORY_TOPICS}

Executive Summary

{EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY}

IMPORTANT: Include inline citations using [citation:Title](URL) format after each claim. Example: "The project gained 10k stars in 3 months citation:GitHub Stats."


Complete Chronological Timeline

PHASE 1: {PHASE_1_NAME}

{PHASE_1_PERIOD}

{PHASE_1_CONTENT}

PHASE 2: {PHASE_2_NAME}

{PHASE_2_PERIOD}

{PHASE_2_CONTENT}

PHASE 3: {PHASE_3_NAME}

{PHASE_3_PERIOD}

{PHASE_3_CONTENT}


Key Analysis

IMPORTANT: Support each analysis point with inline citations [citation:Title](URL).

{ANALYSIS_SECTION_1_TITLE}

{ANALYSIS_SECTION_1_CONTENT}

{ANALYSIS_SECTION_2_TITLE}

{ANALYSIS_SECTION_2_CONTENT}


Architecture / System Overview

flowchart TD
    A[Component A] --> B[Component B]
    B --> C[Component C]
    C --> D[Component D]

{ARCHITECTURE_DESCRIPTION}


Metrics & Impact Analysis

Growth Trajectory

{METRICS_TIMELINE}

Key Metrics

Metric Value Assessment
{METRIC_1} {VALUE_1} {ASSESSMENT_1}
{METRIC_2} {VALUE_2} {ASSESSMENT_2}
{METRIC_3} {VALUE_3} {ASSESSMENT_3}

Comparative Analysis

Feature Comparison

Feature {SUBJECT} {COMPETITOR_1} {COMPETITOR_2}
{FEATURE_1} {SUBJ_F1} {COMP1_F1} {COMP2_F1}
{FEATURE_2} {SUBJ_F2} {COMP1_F2} {COMP2_F2}
{FEATURE_3} {SUBJ_F3} {COMP1_F3} {COMP2_F3}

Market Positioning

{MARKET_POSITIONING}


Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

{STRENGTHS}

Areas for Improvement

{WEAKNESSES}


Key Success Factors

{SUCCESS_FACTORS}


Sources

Primary Sources

{PRIMARY_SOURCES}

Media Coverage

{MEDIA_SOURCES}

Academic / Technical Sources

{ACADEMIC_SOURCES}

Community Sources

{COMMUNITY_SOURCES}


Confidence Assessment

High Confidence (90%+) Claims: {HIGH_CONFIDENCE_CLAIMS}

Medium Confidence (70-89%) Claims: {MEDIUM_CONFIDENCE_CLAIMS}

Lower Confidence (50-69%) Claims: {LOW_CONFIDENCE_CLAIMS}


Research Methodology

This report was compiled using:

  1. Multi-source web search - Broad discovery and targeted queries
  2. GitHub repository analysis - Commits, issues, PRs, activity metrics
  3. Content extraction - Official docs, technical articles, media coverage
  4. Cross-referencing - Verification across independent sources
  5. Chronological reconstruction - Timeline from timestamped data
  6. Confidence scoring - Claims weighted by source reliability

Research Depth: {RESEARCH_DEPTH} Time Scope: {TIME_SCOPE} Geographic Scope: {GEOGRAPHIC_SCOPE}


Report Prepared By: Github Deep Research by DeerFlow Date: {REPORT_DATE} Report Version: 1.0 Status: Complete